E-ISSN:2583-2468

Research Article

Antimicrobial Activity

Applied Science and Engineering Journal for Advanced Research

2022 Volume 1 Number 4 July
Publisherwww.singhpublication.com

Investigation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Some Species Belonging to Pinaceae Family

Ragab SY1*, H ME Emhmd2, A A Alhadad3
DOI:10.54741/asejar.1.4.7

1* Safa YM Ragab, Lecturer, Department of Botany and Faculty of Science, University of Tobruk, Libya.

2 H ME Emhmd, Lecturer, Department of Botany and Faculty of Science, University of Tobruk, Libya.

3 A A Alhadad, Lecturer, Department of Biology and Faculty of Education, Bani Waleed University, Libya.

The aim of this study was to investigation of the antimicrobial activity of some species belonging to pinaceae family collected from turkey, Duration of study one year 2016. In this research, the purpose to examine the inhibitory effects by using an oil that extracted of Pinaceae family plants in a way that steam distealation by Soxhlet apparatus were tested against eighteen microorganisms ( Srains Gram-positive, Gram- negative and Candida albicanis). By Minimum Inhibition Concentrations (MIC) and MBC as shown, Noted in P. burtia have affected against Gram-positive bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Staphylococcus epidermidis DSMZ 20044, E.durans E. faecium and Bacillus subtilis ADSMZ 1971, L. monocytogenes and L.innoeua where were 9µ/ml,3 µ/ml,1 µ/ml,2 µ/ml,1 µ/ml,5 µ/ml and 2 µ/ml respectively. While has no affected against E. facium. And Gram-native bacteria Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella kentucky, Salmonella infantis, Salmonella enterlidis SL 1344, E.coli ATCC 25922 Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 13048, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens DSMZ 50071, Klebsiella pneumonia ATCC 7544 where were 1 µ/ml,2 µ/ml,1 µ/ml,2 µ/ml,1 µ/ml,1 µ/ml,6 µ/ml,2 µ/ml and 1 µ/ml respectively. On the other hand have no affect against C. albicans.

Keywords: antimicrobial activity, pinaceae family, E.durans, E.faecium, bacillus subtilis

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Safa YM Ragab, Lecturer, Department of Botany and Faculty of Science, University of Tobruk, , , Libya.
Email:
Ragab SY, H ME Emhmd, A A Alhadad, Investigation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Some Species Belonging to Pinaceae Family. Appl. Sci. Eng. J. Adv. Res.. 2022;1(4):34-45.
Available From
https://asejar.singhpublication.com/index.php/ojs/article/view/29

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2022-06-22 2022-07-08 2022-07-22
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
None Nil Yes 13.45

© 2022by Ragab SY, H ME Emhmd, A A Alhadadand Published by Singh Publication. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Introduction

Since traditional medicine has always been the most budget-friendly and easily accessible treatment type, it has been the most commonly preferred primary health care system, especially among poor communities.

Throughout the history, traditional plants were used by the local people for therapeutic purposes. As we can understand from the writings, the therapeutic use of medicinal plants, which was firstly used by the Chinese who use the plants as the natural herbal medicines, dates back to ancient times, circa 4000 - 5000 B.C.

(1) However, the Rig-Veda, which is known to be written between 1600 - 3500 B.C., states that plants were firstly used for medicinal purposes in India(2). The ancient physicians focusing on ancient medical treatments in India as a local medicine system studied the characteristics and remedial usage of medicinal plants in detail and recorded the empirical data related to their studies.

Throughout the world, medicinal plants are an integral component of endemic medical systems. The ethno botany stands out as a rich reference guide in terms of the research and development activities with respect to the natural drugs.

The significant historical use is meant by “Traditional” use of phytomedicines (herbal medicines), and this definitely applies to many products that are accessible as “traditional herbal medicines”.(3) A great number of the people in many developing countries mostly depend on traditional practitioners and their treatment techniques using plants therapeutically to deal with their health care needs(8).

Modern medicine can be applied along with such traditional treatment procedures; however, use of plants for medicinal purposes has not fallen from grace thanks to cultural and historical reasons(4). Natural products have been instruments in treating and preventing human diseases all around the world(7).

The production of natural medicines highly depends on Earthbound plants, earthbound microorganisms, marine living beings, and earthly vertebrates and creatures are different origin substances. Various reviews and reports elaborated on the importance of natural products in modern medicine. Within this context(5), it is possible to understand the value of natural products by looking at the following criteria: 1) the rate of the newly introduced chemical substances that have wide structural diversity and serve as a template for semi synthetic and total synthetic modification, 2) the number of the diseases prevented or cured by these chemical entities, and 3) the frequency of these substances used to treat diseases(6).

Material and Method

Plant Material

Plants material used as wood and leaves as (Table1).

Table 1: Plants material

Plant nameSampling siteGPSPlant partsCollection date (2016)
Pinus nigra subsp. pallasinaKASTAMONU41.422128°
33.769934°
Leaves3\8\2016
Abies nordmanniana subsp. equi-trojaniKASTAMONU41.067900°
33.733164°
Leaves30\8\2016
Pinus sylvestrisKASTAMONU41.422964°
33.769494°
Leaves22\9\2016
Picea orientalisKASTAMONU41.425113°
33.772207°
Leaves5\10\2016
Pinus brutiaKASTAMONU41.627530°
34.517599°
Leaves12\10\2016
Cedrus libaniKASTAMONU41.358305°
33.759586°
Wood14\10\2016

PREPARATİON OF CRUDE EXTRACTS

Extract essential oils from leaves and wood: Steam distillation by used Clevenger apparatus oil (photo :1) to separate oil of plants.


asejar_29_01.JPG
Photo 2:
pinus nigra

asejar_29_02.JPG
Photo 1:
Clevenger apparatus oil One Kg from pinus nigra leaves gave oil about 1.65ml as (Photo :2). One Kg from Abies equi-trojani gave oil about 2ml as (Photo :3), One Kg from Pinus sylvestriys gave oil about1.0ml as (Photo:4).

asejar_29_03.JPG
Photo 4:
Pinus sylvestris

asejar_29_04.JPG
Photo 3:
Abies equi-trojani 600g from Picea orientalis gave oil about 1ml as (Photo :5), One Kg from Pinus brutia gave oil about 4ml as (Photo :6).

asejar_29_05.JPG
Photo 6:
Pinus brutia

asejar_29_06.JPG
Photo 5:
Picea orientalis One Kg from Cedrus libani gave oil about1.3ml.


asejar_29_07.JPG
Photo 7:
Cedrus libani

Microbial Material

Strains of fungi and bacteria obtained from the biology Laboratory in Kastamonu University:

Srains Gram-positive bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Staphylococcus epidermidis DSMZ 20044, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Bacillus subtilisA DSMZ 1971 (Table 3.2).

Strains Gram-negative bacteria: Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella kentucky, Salmonella infantis, Salmonella enterlidis SL 1344, coli ATCC 25922, Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 13048, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens DSMZ 50071, Klebsiella pneumonia ATCC 7544 (Table 3.3).

And fungi: Candida albicans DSMZ 1386.

Prepare Microorganisms

A bacteria culture (which has been adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standards (1.0 x 108 CFU/ml) deliberated using the Turbidometer (Oxoid, UK)). Took swab of the bacterial and fungal suspensions by sterile swab then mixed ( saline solution ) in the test tube (Photo :8). After that, wrote the bacteria and fungi names on the tubes then mixed by the shaker befor used.(9)

asejar_29_08.JPG
Photo 8:
Prepare microbs in test tube

Antimicrobial Activity of Extract Oil

Minimum Inhibition Concentrations (MIC’s)

The negligible inhibitory focus (MIC) of an antimicrobial operator is the most minimal (i.e. negligible). We decide the focus in the research facility by hatching a known amount of bacteria with indicated weakenings of the antimicrobial operator this method has just used with samples have a doubt with their results. Have to follow the instructions to get results valid and reliable of any susceptibility test for detecting antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. (10). Had included the concentrates into the Mueller-Hinton agar that arranged from a dehybasdrated form, the pH of the agar must be in the vicinity of 7.2 and 7.4 at room temperature which every plate containing an alternate grouping of the concentrate (Photo 2.13). Inside 15 minutes of modifying the inoculum to the 0.5McFarland turbidity norms, blended the suspension and weaken it so that the last focus in every well is 5 ×10⁵ CFU/ml. Convey 2.0 mL of the first suspension into 38 mL of water (1:20 weakening) [11]. The inoculator of the prongs will exchange 0.01 mL (1:10 weakening) into every well. Immunize MIC board precisely to abstain from sprinkling starting with one well then onto the next (Fig 2.1) [36]. After hatched 18-24 hours at 37˚C temperature, Read the MIC endpoint as the least grouping of antimicrobial specialist that totally represses the development of the living being as identified by the helpless eye.(12)

MBC

For the distinguishing proof of chemical segments, every example was dissected by GCMS QP 2010 Ultra (Shimadzu) furnished with Rtx-5MS narrow section (30m⋅0.25 mm; covering thickness 0.25 ?m). Systematic conditions were injector temperature, 250 ∘C; transporter gas Helium at 1 mL/min; infusion mode: split, split proportion 1:10; volume infused: 1 L of an answer in hexane of the oil; and stove temperature modified from 40∘C to 240˚C at 4∘C/min, pressure:100kPa, cleanse flow:3 ml/min.


The MS examine conditions utilized incorporated an exchange line temperature of 250˚C, an interface temperature of 250˚C, a particle source temperature of 200˚C. Recognizable proof of the constituents depended on examination of the maintenance times and on PC coordinating against Wiley Data library. At the point when conceivable reference mixes were cochromatographed to affirm GC maintenance times.(13)

Results

Table 2: MIC results µ/ml.

MicroorganismsP. bP. nP. sC. lP.oAbies
S. enteritidis211294
C. albicans------
S. aureus9899810
E. faecium262166
E.s faecalis-42---
L. monogtogenies516668
S. typhimirim112271
E. aerogens121263
S. infantis132574
S.a kentucky211174
L.innoeua212252
P. fluorescence222262
K. pneumoniae111253
Bacillus subtilis121352
S. epidermidis3431088
Escherichia coli111255
P.ariginosa674564
E. durans112354

“-’’= No affact

Table 3: MBC results µ/ml.

MicroorganismsP. bP. nP.sC. lP. oAbies
S. enteritidis111-64
C. albicans------
S. aureus2-4224
E. faecium212-53
E.s faecalis-22---
L. monogtogenies2-4214
S. typhimirim1-1-6-
E. aerogens--1-51
S. infantis1-1171
S.a kentucky2-1-64
L.innoeua1-1-41
P. fluorescence--2-42
K. pneumoniae1-1-52
Bacillus subtilis--1-52
S. epidermidis223-45
Escherichia coli1---35
P.ariginosa--1-22
E. durans112-52

“-’’= No affact

In this research, purpose to examine inhibitory effects by using an oil that extracted of Pinaceae family plants in a way that steam distealation by Soxhlet apparatus were tested against eighteen microorganisms ( Srains Gram- positive, Gram-negative and Candida albicanis). By Minimum Inhibition Concentrations (MIC) and MBC as shown ( Table :2, 3).

Noted in P. burtia have affected against Gram-positive bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Staphylococcus epidermidis DSMZ 20044, E.durans E. faecium and Bacillus subtilis ADSMZ 1971, L. monocytogenes and L.innoeua where were 9µ/ml,3 µ/ml,1 µ/ml,2 µ/ml,1 µ/ml,5 µ/ml and 2 µ/ml respectively. While has no affected against E. facium. And Gram- native bacteria Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella kentucky, Salmonella infantis, Salmonella enterlidis SL 1344, E.coli ATCC 25922 Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 13048, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens DSMZ 50071, Klebsiella pneumonia ATCC 7544 where were 1 µ/ml,2 µ/ml,1 µ/ml,2 µ/ml,1 µ/ml,1 µ/ml,6 µ/ml,2 µ/ml and 1 µ/ml respectively. On other hand have no affect against C. albicans. As shown in (Graphic 8).

asejar_29_09.JPG
Photo 9:
MBC of P. burtia

asejar_29_10.JPG
Photo 8:
MIC of P. burtia


asejar_29_11.JPG
Graphic 1:
Antimicrobial Activity of P. brutia

nigra have affected against Gram-positive bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Staphylococcus epidermidis DSMZ 20044, E.durans E. faecium, E. facalis and Bacillus subtilis ADSMZ 1971, L. monocytogenes and L.innoeua where were 8 µ/ml, 4µ/ml, 1µ/ml, 6 µ/ml, 4 µ/ml, 2 µ/ml, 4 µ/ml and 1 respectively. On the other hand have no affect against C. albicans. And Gram-native bacteria Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella kentucky, Salmonella infantis, S. enterlidis, E.coli, E. aerogenes, P.aeruginosa, P. fluorescens and K. pneumonia where were 1µ/ml, 1µ/ml, 3µ/ml, 1µ/ml, 1µ/ml, 2µ/ml, 7µ/ml, 2µ/ml and 1µ/ml. As shown (Graphic 1).

asejar_29_12.JPG
Photo 11:
MBC of P. nigra

asejar_29_13.JPG
Photo 10:
MIC of P. nigra

sylvestris have affected against Gram-positive bacteria: S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E.durans E. faecium, E. facalis, subtilis L.monocytogenes and L.innoeua where were 9 µ/ml, 3 µ/ml, 2 µ/ml, 2 µ/ml, 1µ/ml, 6 µ/ml and 2µ/ml respectively. On the other hand have no affect against C. albicans. And Gram-native bacteria Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella kentucky, Salmonella infantis, S. enterlidis, E.coli, E. aerogenes, P.aeruginosa, P. fluorescens and K. pneumonia where were 2µ/ml, 1µ/ml, 2µ/ml, 1µ/ml, 1µ/ml, 1µ/ml, 4µ/ml, 2µ/ml and 1µ/ml.


asejar_29_14.JPG
Graphic 2:
Antimicrobial Activity of P. nigra

asejar_29_15.JPG
Photo 13:
MBC of P. sylvestris

asejar_29_16.JPG
Photo 12:
MIC of P. sylvestris

asejar_29_17.JPG
Graphic 3:
Antimicrobial Activity of P.sylvestris


libani have affected against Gram-positive bacteria: S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E.durans E. faecium, B. subtilis L.monocytogenes and L.innoeua where were 9µ/ml, 10 µ/ml, 3 µ/ml, 1µ/ml, 3µ/ml, 6µ/ml and 2 µ/ml respectively.

But have no affect against E. facalis and fungi of C. albicans. And Gram-native bacteria Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella kentucky, Salmonella infantis, S. enterlidis, E.coli, E. aerogenes, P.aeruginosa, P. fluorescens and K. pneumonia where were 2µ/ml, 1µ/ml, 5µ/ml, 2µ/ml, 2µ/ml, 2µ/ml, 5µ/ml, 2µ/ml and 2µ/ml. As shown (Graphic 3).

asejar_29_18.JPG
Photo 15. C. libani.

asejar_29_19.JPG
Photo 14:
MIC of C. libani

orientali have affected against Gram-positive bacteria: S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E.durans E. faecium, B. subtilis, L.monocytogenes and L.innoeua where were 8µ/ml, 8µ/ml, 5µ/ml, 6µ/ml, 5µ/ml, 6µ/ml and 5µ/ml respectively.

But have no affect against E. facalis and fungi of C. albicans. And Gram-native bacteria Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella kentucky, Salmonella infantis, S. enterlidis, E.coli, E. aerogenes, P.aeruginosa, P. fluorescens and K. pneumonia where were 7µ/ml, 7µ/ml, 7µ/ml, 9µ/ml, 5µ/ml, 6µ/ml, 6µ/ml, 6 µ/ml and 5µ/ml. As shown in (Graphic 4).

asejar_29_20.JPG
Graphic 4:
Antimicrobial Activity of C.libani


asejar_29_21.JPG
Photo 17:
MBC of P. orientalis

asejar_29_22.JPG
Photo 16:
MIC of P. orientalis

asejar_29_23.JPG
Graphic 5:
Antimicrobial Activity of P.orientalis

equi-trojani have affected against Gram-positive bacteria: S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E.durans, B. subtilis, L.monocytogenes and L.innoeua where were 10 µ/ml, 8µ/ml, 4 µ/ml, 8 µ/ml, 2 µ/ml, 8 µ/ml and 2µ/ml respectively. But have no affect against E. facium . And Gram-native bacteria Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella kentucky, Salmonella infantis, S. enterlidis, E.coli, E. aerogenes, P.aeruginosa, P. fluorescens and K. pneumonia where were 1 µ/ml, 4µ/ml, 4µ/ml, 4µ/ml, 5µ/ml, 3µ/ml, 4µ/ml, 2µ/ml and 3µ/ml. On the other hand have no affect against C. albicans. As shown in (Graphic 5).

asejar_29_24.JPG
Photo 19:
MBC of A. equi-trojani

asejar_29_25.JPG
Photo 18:
MIC of A. equi-trojani


asejar_29_26.JPG
Graphic 6: Antimicrobial Activity of P.orientalis

Conclusion and Discussion

Czerwińska, E., & Szparaga, A. (2015) tested the antimicrobial activity of the leaves, flowers and young sprouts of Pinus sylvestris flowers and leaves essential oil against Gram-positiveand 12 different microorganisms of fungi. They have found a disc-diffusion method inhibition zone of Staphylococcus aureus ( 12.08 mm), Lavandula vera (10.30 mm), Listeria monocytogenes(12.08 mm) and Escherichia coli (ø 8.22 mm) [14].

In our study we determined of MIC value for Staphylococcus aureus 9µg/mL, Listeria monocytogenes 6 µg/mL and 1 µg/mL of E. coli, but no affect againsy fungi. This difference is possibly related to they used 5 g of driedplant poured over 100 ml of cold water and left for 24 h at 20°C, then filtered.(19)

Hakkı Alma et al. (1999) tested the antimicrobial activity of many parts of various trees grown in the Kahramanmaraş region of Turkey of Pinus brutia, Cedrus libani, Pinus nigra and other Chloroform, CH3)2CO and methanol concentrates of leaves in opposite to 15 microorganisms.

The outcomes demonstrated that antifungal impacts were not watched for the entire concentrates, E. coli was not repressed by any of the plant separates aside from by the chloroform and CH3) CO2 concentrates of the leaves of A. cilicia, which separately demonstrated hindrance zones of 16–18 mm [30]. In our study we determined of MIC value for Pinus brutia, Cedrus libani and Pinus nigra (1-9 µg/mL), (1-10 µg/mL) and (1-8 µg/mL), respectively. This difference is possibly related to they used other Chloroform, acetone and methanol extracts of leaves while in our study Steam distillation by used Clevenger apparatus oil.(18)

Eryilmaz, M., Tosun, A., & Tümen, İ. (2016) tried the movement of antimicrobial ethereal concentrates of some Pinaceae and Cupressaceae species gathered from Turkey. The concentrates from Pinus nigra Arn., P. brutia Ten., Cedrus libani A, Abies equi-trojani, Picea orientalis and other against 7 microorganisms. They have found a disc-diffusion method inhibition zone of Pinus nigra Arn agains Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were 8mm. P. brutia Ten against Pseudomonas aeruginosa 8mm. Cedrus libani has no affect.


Picea orientalis aganst Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa werw 7mm, 7mm, 7mm 8mm and 7mm, respectively, but have no affect against Candida albicans with all extract [16]. In our study we determined of MIC value for Pinus brutia, Cedrus libani, Pinus nigra Abies equi-trojani and Picea orientalis were (1-9 µg/mL), (1-10 µg/mL), (1-8 µg/mL), (1-10 µg/mL) and (1-8 µg/mL) respectively. Except Candida albicans have no affect.(17)

References

1. Hosseinzadeh, S., Jafarikukhdan, A., Hosseini, A., & Armand, R. (2015). The application of medicinal plants in traditional and modern medicine: A review of thymus International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 6(9), 635.
2. Ghimire, B., Lee, C., Yang, J., & Heo, K. (2015). Comparative leaf anatomy of some species of Abies and Picea (Pinaceae). Acta Botanica Brasilica, 29(3), 346-353.
3. Tumen, I., Hafizoglu, H., Kilic, A., Dönmez, I. E., Sivrikaya, H., & Reunanen, M. (2010). Yields and constituents of essential oil from cones of Pinaceae natively grown in Turkey. Molecules, 15, 5797-5806.
4. Šarac, Z., Matejić, J. S., Stojanović-Radić, Z. Z., Veselinović, J. B., Džamić, A. M., Bojović, S., & Marin, P. D. (2014). Biological activity of Pinus nigra terpenes—Evaluation of FtsZ inhibition by selected compounds as contribution to their antimicrobial activity. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 54, 72-78.
5. Maciąg, A., Milaković, D., Christensen, H. H., Antolović, V., & Kalemba, D. (2007). Essential oil composition and plant-insect relations in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris ).
6. Saab, (2011). Phytochemical analysis, antiproliferative against k562 humam chronic myelogenus leukemia, antiviral and hypoglycaemic activities of cedrus species and medicinal plants native from Libanon. (Doctoral Dissertation, Università Degli Studi di Ferrara).

7. Sonmez, T., Keles, S., & Tilki, F. (2007). Effect of aspect, tree age and tree diameter on bark thickness of Picea Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 22(3), 193-197.
8. Spanos, I. A., Daskalakou, E. N., & Thanos, C. A. (2000). Postfire, natural regeneration of Pinus brutia forests in Thasos island, Greece. Acta Oecologica, 21(1), 13-20.
9. Kaya, Z., Skaggs, A., & Neale, D. B. (2008). Genetic Differentiation of Abies equi-trojani (Asch. & Sint. ex Boiss) Mattf. populations from Kazdağı, Turkey and the genetic relationship between Turkish Firs belonging to the Abies nordmanniana Spach Turkish Journal of Botany, 32(1), 1- 10.
10. Choi, O., Cho, S. K., Kim, J., Park, C. G., & Kim, J. (2016). In vitro antibacterial activity and major bioactive components of Cinnamomum verum essential oils against cariogenic bacteria, Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 6(4), 308-314.
11. Outhman, A. M., & Lamma, O. A. (2020). Investigate the contamination of tissue paper with heavy metals in the local IJCS, 8(1), 1264-1268.
12. Eryilmaz, , Tosun, A., & Tümen, İ. (2016). Antimicrobial Activity of Some Species from Pinaceae and Cupressaceae. Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 13(1).
13. Zrira, S., & Ghanmi, M. (2016). Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of the essential of cedrus atlantica (Cedarwood oil). Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants, 19(5), 1267-1272.
14. Czerwińska, E., & Szparaga, A. (2015). Antibacterial and antifungal activity of plant extracts. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska, 17(cz. 1), 209-229.
15. Demirci, F., Bayramiç, P., Göger, G., Demirci, B., & Başer, K. H. C. (2015). Characterization and antimicrobial evaluation of the essential oil of pinus pinea from Turkey. Natural Volatiles & Essential Oils, 2(2).


16. Šarac, Z., Matejić, J. S., Stojanović-Radić, Z. Z., Veselinović, J. B., Džamić, A. M., Bojović, S., & Marin, P. D. (2014). Biological activity of Pinus nigra terpenes—Evaluation of FtsZ inhibition by selected compounds as contribution to their antimicrobial Computers in biology and medicine, 54, 72-78.