Moreover, the deal continues to append to the Blockchain hence causing escalated storage requirements. Some Blockchain applications demand that the node has the complete copy of the history of Blockchain transactions that cannot be achieved in devices that have limited resources. Some attempts have been made in this direction, such as, IoT has some prospects that can help to mitigate the problems due to scarcity of resources. Nevertheless, more study and approval are required to be implemented in 5G and beyond networks.[19]
d) Selection of suitable Blockchain platform: There have been several Blockchain platforms in the marketplace since the inception of Bitcoin. However, there are not sufficient experimental studies to report the suitability of one platform over the other one. This creates a challenge for adopting a suitable Blockchain platform on 5G networks which would be able to accommodate diverse requirements, such as performance, infrastructure cost, and data privacy, etc. This challenge cannot be tackled unless further experimental evidence could be provided. Hence, the Blockchain research community [17] needs to conduct more pilot research projects to explore and report the suitability of different Blockchain platforms for integration with 5G networks and beyond.
8. Conclusion
The combination of Blockchain and AI constitutes an encouraging scenario to solve the security and privacy issues of 5G-IoT systems. The case study is evidence that these technologies have so much potential to develop a secure, efficient, and smart framework of future IoT applications beyond 5G. Further studies are needed to streamline this combination and investigate how it can be used in many other scenarios in order to further prove its usefulness.
References
1. Zhou, W., Zhang, Y., & Liu, P. (2018). The effect of IoT new features on security and privacy: New threats, existing solutions, and challenges yet to be solved. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(2), 1606-1616.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8386824
2. Singh, S., Singh, N. (2016). Blockchain: Future of financial and cyber security. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), pp. 463-467. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7918009
3. Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., Grieco, L. A., & Coen-Porisini, A. (2015). Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead. Computer Networks, 76, 146-164. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1389128614003971
4. Roman, R., Najera, P., & Lopez, J. (2011). Securing the Internet of Things. Computer, 44(9), 51-58. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6017172
5. Mollah, M. B., Zhao, J., & Niyato, D. (2020). A comprehensive review of blockchain and AI techniques in the smart grid: Past, present, and future. IEEE Access, 8, 150653-150670. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9090812
6. Hassija, V., Chamola, V., & Sikdar, B. (2020). A survey on IoT security: Application areas, security threats, and solution architectures. IEEE Access, 7, 82721-82743. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8742551
7. Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., Jurdak, R., & Gauravaram, P. (2017). Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), pp. 618-623. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7917634
8. M. N. Aman, K. C. Chua, & B. Sikdar. (2017). Mutual authentication in IoT systems using physical unclonable functions. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(5), 1327–1340.
9. D. F. Rajesh Kandaswamy. (2018). Blockchain-based transformation. https://www.gartner.com/en/doc/3869696-blockchain-basedtransformation-a-gartner-trend-insight-report/
10. GSMA. (2019). Safety, privacy and security. https://www.gsma.com/publicpolicy/resources/safetyprivacy-security-across-mobileecosystem/
11. Flashpoint. (2018). Mirai botnet linked to dyn DNS DDoS attacks. https://www.flashpoint-intel.com/blog/cybercrime/mirai-botnet-linked-dyn-dns-ddos-attacks/