E-ISSN:2583-2468

Research Article

Platform Engineering

Applied Science and Engineering Journal for Advanced Research

2025 Volume 4 Number 1 January
Publisherwww.singhpublication.com

Driving Digital Transformation: Leveraging Site Reliability Engineering and Platform Engineering for Scalable and Resilient Systems

Devan K1*
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.14799721

1* Karthigayan Devan, Engineering Manager - SRE (Independent Researcher), Genuine Parts Company, GA, United States of America.

In today's competitive landscape, achieving scalability, resilience, and rapid innovation is important for organizations seeking digital transformation. This paper describes how Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) and Platform Engineering can be used to help drive these transformations. Integrating SRE practices with robust platform engineering methodologies allows organizations to develop the tools they need to build scalable, high-performing, and resilient systems. The paper discusses methodologies used, a mixed-method approach combining qualitative case studies and quantitative performance metrics, to evaluate the impact of SRE and Platform Engineering. Results from case studies across multiple organizations indicate important improvements in uptime, recovery time, scalability, and overall efficiency of the systems. This work highlights the crucial role that these engineering practices play in enabling digital transformation and operational excellence.

Keywords: site reliability engineering, platform engineering, digital transformation, scalability, resiliency, system performance

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Karthigayan Devan, Engineering Manager - SRE (Independent Researcher), Genuine Parts Company, GA, United States of America.
Email: 		Devan K, Driving Digital Transformation: Leveraging Site Reliability Engineering and Platform Engineering for Scalable and Resilient Systems. Appl. Sci. Eng. J. Adv. Res.. 2025;4(1):21-29.
Available From
https://asejar.singhpublication.com/index.php/ojs/article/view/128

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2024-12-16 2025-01-04 2025-01-27
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
None Nil Yes 3.69

© 2025by Devan Kand Published by Singh Publication. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Appl. Sci. Eng. J. Adv. Res. 2025;4(1)21
Download PDFBack To Article1. Introduction2. Review of
Literature3. Research
Methodology4. Data Analysis
and Results5. Discussion6. ConclusionReferences
Devan K. Driving Digital Transformation

1. Introduction

The transformation of digitization has been the new foundation for organizations aiming to stay agile and competitive within today's rapid technological evolution (Chinamanagonda, 2023). Cloud computing has come into place, big data analytics has begun to rise, and microservices architectures have come to be in a way to revolutionize business operations and the delivery of services (Das, 2024). As companies push for faster delivery cycles, better user experiences, and uninterrupted services, ensuring the scalability, reliability, and resilience of their systems becomes paramount. To address these critical needs, many organizations are turning to advanced engineering practices that emphasize system performance, continuous availability, and operational efficiency (Erhueh, 2024). Among these practices, SRE and Platform Engineering stand out as foundational methodologies that underpin the execution of digital transformation for organizations so that they are able to construct and maintain effective systems that can scale up robustly yet tolerate failure.

Site Reliability Engineering is an amalgamation of software engineering practices with traditional system administration techniques to develop highly reliable and scalable systems (George, 2024). SRE is more about automating manual operations, monitoring, and incident response in order to enhance system uptime, reduce errors, and achieve faster recovery times. It equips organizations with the means to define reliability metrics (such as Service Level Objectives, SLOs) and track system performance against those goals (Huang, 2023). The adoption of SRE would, therefore bring a more harmonized approach between developers and operations towards managing production systems. The thrust areas of the SRE's pro-active approach toward risk, automation, and data-driven decisions are what's proved to make the difference with regards to their scalability without undermining reliability. (Ikwuanusi, 2024)

In parallel with SRE, there emerged the concept of Platform Engineering as a best practice for building an underpinning infrastructure that is both scalable and resilient. Therefore, Platform Engineering involves developing and maintaining platforms, which are collections of tools, environments, and services, to ensure easier development, deployment, and management of applications (Irmak, 2023).

Unlike traditional IT infrastructure management, the developer-centric approach of Platform Engineering develops a unified platform that serves the needs of development teams to achieve consistency, efficiency, and flexibility across environments. By offering scalable, secure, and reliable platforms, organizations can rapidly deploy applications with performance and availability standards. Platform engineering helps to reduce the complexity and bottlenecks that mostly result from managing diverse infrastructures and technologies across different teams and services.

From these two, a strong synergy can be formed to drive digital transformation as both SRE and Platform Engineering harmonize towards providing self-healing, highly available systems while allowing an environment to flourish with rapid innovation and development (Mulder, 2021). Organizations can get more efficiency in their operations or speed up the delivery of services through using SRE principles for system reliability and building underlying infrastructure using Platform Engineering. Together, these techniques form a robust solution to overcome challenges in modern systems, which now have to address increasingly complex workloads with an expectation of extremely high uptime and response times.

1.1 Role of Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) in Digital Transformation

Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) is seen as one of the critical practices where organizations look towards enhancing the scale and resilience in their systems. SRE will apply software engineering principles to ensure that the given systems are reliable, fault tolerant, and at the same time scalable. It facilitates the automation of operational tasks-incident response, system monitoring etc. -leading to a decreased downtime, good system performance and faster recovery time (Onesi-Ozigagun, 2024). This chapter explores the ways in which SRE supports digital transformation by focusing on reliability metrics, automation, and proactive risk management in the upkeep of high-availability systems.

1.2 Role of Platform Engineering in Building Scalable and Resilient Infrastructure

Platform Engineering is crucial in setting foundational infrastructure in place, ensuring scalable and resilient systems (Parri, 2021).


Appl. Sci. Eng. J. Adv. Res. 2025;4(1)22
Devan K. Driving Digital Transformation

It is in contrast to traditional IT infrastructure management where it's more about building developer-friendly platforms to get applications up fast, manage efficiently, and have consistent environments across the systems. Platform Engineering empowers organizations to scale their applications in a seamless manner through the assurance that underpinning platforms could take increased workloads while showing no degradation in system performance. It shares how Platform Engineering supports the formation of robust and flexible platforms in service of the general goals of digital transformation.

1.3 Research Objectives

  • To examine how Site Reliability Engineering contributes to system resilience and scalability.
  • To explore the role of Platform Engineering in supporting scalable and resilient architectures.
  • To evaluate the combined impact of SRE and Platform Engineering on digital transformation.

2. Review of Literature

Abili and Hemeda (2023), insight-driven digital engineering represents a key enabler for driving operational intelligence in the energy industry (Abili, 2023). Their study further highlighted how, through the incorporation of digital engineering techniques in combination with data analytics, it is possible to transform traditional operational workflows into adaptive and efficient systems. Authors argued that with real-time data and predictive analytics driving this operational intelligence, processes and systems in the energy sector would significantly improve their decision-making processes and system reliability. In addition, with more and more industries shifting to increasingly digitally connected environments, such a platform has not only to be scaleable but also quite resilient to unseen disruption. This aligns with the broader conversation on the need for robust platforms capable of scaling, along with maintaining a high availability level and fault tolerance.

Almufti and Zeebaree (2024) did a review on strategies and frameworks that utilize the distributed systems environment for fault tolerant cloud computing. They discussed a growing reliance on these cloud-based systems and the resulting challenges of obtaining system reliability as well as scale in such environments (Almufti, 2024).

Among the mechanisms identified for fault tolerance were replication, load balancing, as well as automation recovery systems to form the fundamental structure of present-day cloud infrastructures. The authors clearly pointed out the evolution of distributed systems and cloud computing, where resilience needs to be built into a system design that minimizes disruption in service. They concluded that organizations interested in scaling services and applications in a fault-tolerant manner would be interested in using distributed frameworks-a key aspect for SRE and Platform Engineering, achieving reliable and scalable systems.

Al-Rubaye et al. (2019) contributed the literature in terms of covering the role of digital grids in the enabling of industrial revolutions with self-healing, cyber-resilient platforms. According to their work, resilience is significant in the face of cyber threats and system failures (Al-Rubaye, 2019). They brought an exhaustive presentation regarding the introduction of self-healing capacities-automation with advance monitoring-and integrate this kind of self-healing ability to provide continuity during interruption even into a digital grid. In general, as industrial segments move more forward and tend toward greater integrations with cyber-physical systems, it gives pressure for establishing resilience on these new platforms cyberwise. Their work emphasized that platforms should be built not only to scale efficiently but also to self-correct at failure, an important principle both in SRE and Platform Engineering frameworks.

Behrendt et al. (2021) explored the role of Industrial IoT and other advanced technologies in digital transformation across industries. The authors offered a detailed account of how IIoT, integrated with other leading-edge technologies, can help streamline operations, improve decision-making, and enhance the overall efficiency of industrial systems (Behrendt, 2021). The authors explained how IIoT facilitates real-time data collection and analysis, thus enabling more informed and responsive decision-making processes. They emphasized the fact that this kind of transformation through these technologies enables organizations to shift from legacy, siloed operations towards more interconnected data-driven systems. In addition, they pointed out that although scalability is one of the most impressive opportunities offered by IIoT, the systems' integration will require careful reliability and security concerns,


Appl. Sci. Eng. J. Adv. Res. 2025;4(1)23
Devan K. Driving Digital Transformation

which relates to the application of SRE practices toward robust, fault-tolerant infrastructures.

Chelliah, Naithani, and Singh (2018) seemed to be providing a practical guide on how to automate the process of designing, developing, and delivering highly reliable applications and services. Their work provided practical insights into the applicability of SRE as implemented in terms of improving the reliability of systems with automation and CI/CD pipelines. Authors mainly discussed how principles of SRE, like setting SLOs, automating response to incidents, and building powerful monitoring systems, could ensure availability and performance with complex distributed systems (Chelliah, 2018). The role of automation in building resilience in systems has been emphasized while elaborating how automated testing, deployment, and recovery mechanisms could minimize service disruptions and application service. The book proved to be a very good source for organizations that wanted to implement SRE practices, scale their systems, and ensure that they remain fault-tolerant as they grow.

3. Research Methodology

The following section goes about the research methodology by amalgamating a mixed-method approach, namely the case study, combined with some traditional performance metrics in order to assess the impact of SRE and Platform Engineering on the system scalability and resiliency. Data was collected from five organizations distributed in different sectors using a mix of surveys, interviews, and system performance metrics. Statistical methods were adopted for the analysis of quantitative data, while thematic analysis was carried out for the qualitative insight to ensure that every methodology is incorporated.

3.1 Research Design

This research utilized a mixed-methods approach: case study analysis based on qualitative methodology was complemented by the evaluation of quantitative metrics. This approach would ideally ensure a comprehensive review of the impact SRE and Platform Engineering could have on system scalability and resilience. In the qualitative form, case studies were drawn from organizations which had implemented these practices to understand the specific strategies and methodologies they employed, the challenges faced during implementation, and their respective outcomes.

These case studies showed in detail the integration of SRE and Platform Engineering into the operations, focusing on performance improvements in the system, including reliability and fault tolerance. From the quantitative end, performance metrics such as uptime, latency, error rates, and recovery times were collected and used to test the effectiveness of these engineering practices in achieving some tangible results. By using both qualitative and quantitative approaches, this study aims to gain an integrative perspective of the pros and cons brought by the adaptation of SRE and Platform Engineering and, by providing a data-driven analysis of its impact on modern systems in terms of scalability and resilience.

3.2 Data Collection Tools

Surveys, system performance data and semi-structured interviews were relied upon as core methods of obtaining primary data from this research work. The respective questionnaires, with specific questions geared toward assessing level of adoption of these methodologies within organizations, especially DevOps teams and engineering personnel who had absorbed the SRE and Platform Engineering methodologies, would be distributed amongst these organizations. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders like system architects and engineers to deepen the understanding of the implementation processes, operational difficulties, and practical experiences with these engineering practices. Finally, system performance metrics, including uptime, latency, and error rates, were collected from various case study organizations to provide quantitative data on how SRE and Platform Engineering affect system performance. This diverse set of data sources would enable the different methodologies for thorough evaluation and validation for driving scalable and resilient systems.

3.3 Sampling

A total of five organizations across different sectors such as e-commerce, finance, healthcare, cloud service providers, and telecommunications have been chosen for this study. Organizations have been specifically chosen based on their experience with digital transformation and SRE and Platform Engineering practices in the implementations. Selections are made in order to represent a cross-section of the industries actively employing these methodologies in pursuit of scaling, resilience, and


Appl. Sci. Eng. J. Adv. Res. 2025;4(1)24
Devan K. Driving Digital Transformation

operational efficiency within their systems. This research aimed to gather broad insights and experiences regarding the adoption and impact of these engineering practices in various business contexts by studying organizations from diverse sectors.

3.4 Analysis Methods

Statistical analysis techniques were applied to the quantitative data gathered from the system performance metrics to understand system performance based on parameters like uptime, latency, and error rates due to the implementation of SRE and Platform Engineering. For the qualitative data derived from surveys and interviews, thematic analysis was used to determine common patterns, trends, and themes related to adoption, challenges, and benefits associated with these engineering disciplines. This approach helped to understand in depth how SRE and Platform Engineering are implemented and the impact of their effects on the workings of organizations, both with numerical insight and qualitative views as to the realities of practical application.

4. Data Analysis and Results

In the results section of this study, it discusses findings related to SRE and Platform Engineering's impacts on system performance. The practice of SRE provided improved system availability, faster recovery, and low error rates. Platform Engineering allowed scalability of the systems, increased capacity for users, and reduced latency. Combining SRE with Platform Engineering provided higher improvements in both the availability and efficiency of the systems. The following tables and figures summarize key findings and metrics.

4.1 Impact of Site Reliability Engineering (SRE)

SRE practice improves system availability and incident response. Organizations implementing SRE had their downtime reduced and shorter recovery times. The following table outlines the main outcomes:

Table 1: Impact of Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) on System Performance Metrics

OrganizationSRE ImplementationDowntime Reduction (%)Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)Error Rate Reduction (%)
E-commerce CompanyFull SRE Adoption35%15 minutes20%
Financial InstitutionPartial Adoption20%25 minutes15%
Healthcare ProviderFull SRE Adoption40%12 minutes25%
Cloud Service ProviderFull SRE Adoption45%10 minutes30%
Telecom CompanyPartial Adoption25%18 minutes18%

asejar_128_01.JPG
Figure 1: Graphical Representation on Impact of Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) on System Performance Metrics

A survey of the data in Table 1 clearly shows that the performance of an organization's systems was drastically improved by the adoption of SRE practices. The complete adoption of SRE, fully owning it like the e-commerce company, healthcare provider, and cloud service provider, led to a considerable improvement, including a reduction in downtime (35%-45%) and faster recovery, with MTTR being as low as 10 minutes. Furthermore, these organizations also saw a considerable decrease in error rates of between 20% and 30%. Partial SRE adopters like the financial institution and the telecom company achieved lesser gains; for example, downtime reduction was lower at 20%-25%, while recovery times were slower at 18-25 minutes, and the reductions in error rates were lower at 15%-18%.


Appl. Sci. Eng. J. Adv. Res. 2025;4(1)25
Devan K. Driving Digital Transformation

These results emphasize the effectiveness of full SRE implementation in enhancing system reliability and responsiveness, with greater improvements in availability, recovery, and error management compared to partial adoption.

4.2 Impact of Platform Engineering

Platform Engineering greatly impacted the scalability of the system. Organizations have reported increased capacity and reduced bottlenecks; they can handle more concurrent users without causing performance degradation, as shown by the table below, presenting the main performance metrics:

Table 2: Impact of Platform Engineering on System Scalability and Performance Metrics

OrganizationPlatform Engineering AdoptionConcurrent Users Increase (%)System Load Handling Improvement (%)Latency Reduction (%)
E-commerce CompanyFull Adoption50%40%25%
Financial InstitutionPartial Adoption30%35%20%
Healthcare ProviderFull Adoption45%50%22%
Cloud Service ProviderFull Adoption55%60%30%
Telecom CompanyPartial Adoption28%30%18%

asejar_128_02.JPG
Figure 2: Graphical Representation on Impact of Platform Engineering on System Scalability and Performance Metrics

The data provided in Table 2 clearly showcases the effects that Platform Engineering is having on an organization's scale and performance level across organizations. Significant improvements in several key performance indicators are shown,

based on examples from the three case studies from the e-commerce firm, healthcare agency, and the cloud service company. These organizations saw significant increases in the number of concurrent users they could handle (ranging from 45% to 55%), substantial improvements in system load handling (up to 60%), and reductions in latency (up to 30%).

Organisations adopting partially witnessed better improvement on the same counts of 28-30 percent improvement in concurrent users, system load handling with improvements between 30-35 percent and reduction of latency between 18-20 percent. These findings demonstrate that Platform Engineering is an activity that plays an important role in improving system capacity and performance-fully adopted increases the capacity and productivity, especially scaling up to hold more users or reducing latency significantly.

4.3 Synergistic Impact of SRE and Platform Engineering

When both SRE and Platform Engineering practices were combined, the improvements in scalability and resilience were significantly more pronounced. The following results demonstrate this synergistic effect:

Table 3: Synergistic Impact of SRE and Platform Engineering on System Availability and Efficiency

OrganizationSRE + Platform Engineering AdoptionSystem Availability Improvement (%)Overall System Efficiency Improvement (%)
E-commerce CompanyFull Adoption50%45%
Financial InstitutionPartial Adoption35%30%
Healthcare ProviderFull Adoption55%50%
Cloud Service ProviderFull Adoption60%55%
Telecom CompanyPartial Adoption40%35%

Appl. Sci. Eng. J. Adv. Res. 2025;4(1)26
Devan K. Driving Digital Transformation

asejar_128_03.JPG
Figure 3: Graphical Representation on Synergistic Impact of SRE and Platform Engineering on System Availability and Efficiency

As presented in Table 3, the aggregation of Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) and Platform Engineering best practices improved system availability and efficiency considerably. Companies, which completely employed both methods in their businesses- an e-commerce company, healthcare provider, and cloud service provider-showed more than 50% and 60% improvements respectively in terms of system availability as well as 45% and 55% improvements respectively about overall system efficiency. This integrated practice enabled these companies to not only increase system uptime but also streamline processes, thereby becoming more efficient. In the case of the partially adopted companies, such as the financial institution and the telecom company, the benefits in terms of availability ranged between 35% and 40% and efficiency 30% to 35%, meaning the end benefit, with a full integration of SRE and Platform Engineering in terms of scalability and resilience, is better. This reinforces the value of a holistic approach, where the synergies between these two practices result in significantly enhanced system performance.

5. Discussion

This study's outcomes weigh into the critical roles SRE and Platform Engineering play in the scalability, resiliency, and performance of systems. The conclusion is that, indeed, organizations that fully employed SRE and Platform Engineering significantly improved their respective key performance metrics, such as system uptime, time to incident response, and the ability to support greater numbers of users. The synergy in SRE and Platform Engineering came out the clearest,

which in organizations that applied both of these practices resulted in faster recovery times, greater efficiency in handling loads, and lesser latency. An integrated approach enabled such organizations to scale their systems more effectively while ensuring high resilience levels, which is very important for maintaining continuous operations in an always-evolving digital environment.

Among its key advantages of combining SRE and Platform Engineering is how one complements the other. It is because whereas SRE's focus lies on ensuring reliability with reduced downtime due to proactive monitoring, incident management, and automation, Platform Engineering provides the essential infrastructure and tools that enable efficient resource management and scalability as well as rapid deployments. Together, these practices foster an environment where systems can evolve and scale without compromising performance or reliability, meeting the increasing demands of modern applications.

Although challenges to adopting SRE and Platform Engineering come as part of the drill, one of the greatest barriers organizations faces is the readiness to set things up and integrate these methodologies with the organization, as it may create resource consumption and change the workflows of what existed. The process is usually very culturally challenging, as a change has to be triggered in the way of thinking that regards system management and reliability. Furthermore, implementation requires a developed skill set as both SRE and Platform Engineering involve very advanced technical practices requiring experts in different domains, from automation and cloud infrastructure to architectural designs. While some organizations applied one or both with a lesser deployment and still could report system improvement performance, even these reported only much slower, proving the adoption to be partially complete and involving needed skill forces for successful and proper execution.

In the midst of all these challenges, there is an overall undeniable effect that SRE and Platform Engineering can have on a system in terms of its scalability and resilience. Organizations embracing these practices saw improvements in their systems' performance as well as developed robust infrastructures, capable of growing with and addressing future needs.


Appl. Sci. Eng. J. Adv. Res. 2025;4(1)27
Devan K. Driving Digital Transformation

With time, the digitization of sectors, it would most likely play an important role in determining whether these modern systems live or die.

6. Conclusion

This study brings out the enormous benefits that may be gained through the combination of Site Reliability Engineering and Platform Engineering to ensure improved scalability and robustness for systems. Organizations can achieve huge improvements in system availability, performance, and the sheer capacity to take on more users with increased demands through this combination of methodologies. The synergy of SRE and Platform Engineering produces a robust infrastructure in support of digital transformation with even superior operational efficiency and reliability. If an organization seriously considers making their systems more scalable and resilient, then both practices should be considered for optimal utilization. Although there are issues of implementation and specifically required skills, the other benefits are long-term: less downtime, faster recovery, and improved system performance. Future studies may unpack the long-term implications of SRE and Platform Engineering adoption, specifically in terms of customer satisfaction and business outcomes and how future needs in a digital business are met.

References

1. Abili, & S. Hemeda. (2023). Insight-driven digital engineering–A key enabler driving operational intelligence in the energy industry. in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, pp. D031S039R006.

2. M. Almufti, & S. R. Zeebaree. (2024). Leveraging distributed systems for fault-tolerant cloud computing: A review of strategies and frameworks. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 13(2), 9-29.

3. Al-Rubaye, J. Rodriguez, A. Al-Dulaimi, S. Mumtaz, & J. J. Rodrigues. (2019). Enabling digital grid for industrial revolution: self-healing cyber resilient platform. IEEE Network, 33(5), 219-225.

4. Behrendt, E. De Boer, T. Kasah, B. Koerber, N. Mohr, & G. Richter. (2021). Leveraging industrial IoT and advanced technologies for digital transformation. McKinsey & Company, pp. 1-75.

5. R. Chelliah, S. Naithani, & S. Singh. (2018). Practical site reliability engineering: Automate the process of designing, developing, and delivering highly reliable apps and services with SRE, Packt Publishing Ltd.

6. Chinamanagonda. (2023). Focus on resilience engineering in cloud services. Academia Nexus Journal, 2(1).

7. K. Das. (2024). Exploring the symbiotic relationship between digital transformation, infrastructure, service delivery, and governance for smart sustainable cities. Smart Cities, 7(2), 806-835.

8. V. Erhueh, C. Nwakile, O. A. Akano, A. E. Esiri, & E. Hanson. (2024). Digital transformation in energy asset management: Lessons for building the future of energy infrastructure. Global Journal of Research in Science and Technology, 2(2), 010-037.

9. S. George, & T. Baskar. (2024). Driving business transformation through technology innovation: Emerging priorities for IT leaders. Partners Universal Innovative Research Publication, 2(4), 01-14.

10. Huang. (2023). Digital engineering transformation with trustworthy AI towards industry 4.0: Emerging paradigm shifts. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 26(3-4), 267-290.

11. F. Ikwuanusi, O. Onunka, S. J. Owoade, & A. Uzoka. (2024). Digital transformation in public sector services: Enhancing productivity and accountability through scalable software solutions. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6, 2744-2774.

12. Irmak, E. Kabalci, & Y. Kabalci. (2023). Digital transformation of microgrids: a review of design, operation, optimization, and cybersecurity. Energies, 16(12), 4590.

13. Mulder. (2021). Enterprise DevOps for architects: Leverage AIOps and DevSecOps for secure digital transformation. Packt Publishing Ltd.

14. Onesi-Ozigagun, Y. J. Ololade, N. L. Eyo-Udo, & D. O. Ogundipe. (2024). Leading digital transformation in non-digital sectors: A strategic review. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(4), 1157-1175.


Appl. Sci. Eng. J. Adv. Res. 2025;4(1)28
Devan K. Driving Digital Transformation

15. J. Parri, F. Patara, S. Sampietro, & E. Vicario. (2021). A framework for model-driven engineering of resilient software-controlled systems. Computing, 103(4), 589-612.

Disclaimer / Publisher's Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of Journals and/or the editor(s). Journals and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Appl. Sci. Eng. J. Adv. Res. 2025;4(1)29